Inov-8 Bare-Grip 200 Review

By BdayShoes on Jan 17, 2013 | In general | 5 comments »

Guest review by Dan C.

When I first started moving in the direction of minimal footwear, the one aspect of life I struggled with was outdoor sports like football. I play flag football regularly, yet I just can't stand cleats. Let's be honest...for the most part, they are terrible. However, most of my minimal shoes, even "trail" shoes, just wouldn't cut it. Football is obviously a game that involves sprinting and quick changes in direction, and it's played on varying surfaces due to weather.

So I wanted something with good grip, but also something that wasn't as stiff and restrictive as the cleats I'd been wearing all my life. I started a journey to find a pair of minimal shoes that could replace football cleats. I searched high and low for user opinions on "minimal cleats" or "minimalist football shoes". Needless to say, there wasn't much out there to help me in this search. So after looking at endless websites and fighting with my indecisive self, I finally settled on a pair that looked to be up to the challenge. What I ended up with was a pair of Inov-8 Bare-Grip 200's.

How did they fare? Read on!

 

Minimalist Cleats

The first thing I noticed about this pair of shoes was the very aggressive outsole. The lugs almost make the shoe look like a football cleat.

What seems to be a strange combination however, is the fact that these shoes also have no midsole. This made me wonder how they'd feel, but honestly, the combination works great. When walking over pavement or hard surfaces, you can feel the lugs, but it's not even remotely annoying.

In addition to the lack of midsole, the upper portion of the shoe is very thin and flexible. It's super thin, yet has ample reinforcement where you'd expect. I've found that this minimal upper actually benefits the user in two ways. First and most obvious is that they are super light and allow the foot to move naturally. The second benefit is that when they get wet, as is often the case in outdoor sports, they do not hold much water. So they stay rather light, even in the worst conditions.

Another aspect that lends itself to a sport like football, is that you can really tie these shoes tight to your feet. The upper really conforms nicely to the foot to the point where it's almost unnoticeable. Now, I do understand that most people, when looking for minimal footwear, appreciate a large toe box to allow the toes room to splay naturally. However, I think in cases like the Bare Grip 200, it's nice to have a more snug fit that doesn't shift around when making abrupt movements. These shoes are almost like a spiked extension of your own foot (what a coincidence since this is what was pictured on the box).

Minimalist shoes for football

This combination of thin, light, and flexible materials really benefit a football player (even a mediocre on like myself). When I am pushing off from the line of scrimmage, they grip nicely. When I'm moving sideline to sideline, there is never a chance of rolling over and they plant firmly in most conditions. When in full stride, they are light and unnoticeable. These shoes are inspiring in that you really feel the playing field in ways normal cleats just don't allow.

However, with the extra feel there comes a bit of sacrifice. First of all, if you step on a rock or other similar object, you will feel it. The lack of midsole allows you to feel the ground...and anything on it! The other downside is that there is very little protection to the top of the foot. Occasionally, another player will step on my foot and it's definitely a bit worse than if I was wearing standard cleats. However, I have yet to experience anything bad enough to make me want to switch back. I'll gladly sacrifice the extra bulk for a natural, minimal football "cleat".

Concluding thoughts

I've been wearing these shoes for about six months now and I honestly couldn't be more happy with them. They are very comfortable, and they feel light and quick. They have also been very durable. I wear them a couple times a week for various activities, and aside from getting dirty, they don't show any signs of wear and tear yet.

At full price ($110 @ Zappos), they could be a bit expensive for a shoe you might only wear for one flag football game a week. But I'll remind any prospective buyer that they are technically a trail running shoe. So, don't forget to factor that into the equation. Also, they only come in green...so you can use them for yard work as well!

I would recommend the Inov-8 Bare-Grip 200's to any "weekend warrior" who wants a light and comfortable, minimal cleat-like shoe.

If you can catch them on sale, they are truly a bargain.

Photos

About the Author — BdayShoes is the "guest blogger" everyman (or woman!) of BirthdayShoes.com. Periodically, we feature original posts from non-regular writers on the blog here. Those posts get published under this user! If you're interested in contributing a one-off post to BirthdayShoes, contact us!
BdayShoes has written 22 articles and 0 comments.
Tags: inov8, review

wait! before you go —

« Hiking, Traveling New Zealand with KSO Trek FiveFingers (and Sprints)Topo Athletic's Two-Toed Tabi Sneaker »
Comment from: Rob [Member] Email
Interesting take and nice review! I've also used this shoe quite a bit for minimalist trail running and although I really liked the overall functionality I have a huge gripe about the lack of durability in the upper. The big issue with this shoe is that Inov-8 used the F-Lite vamp which is nearly 100% mesh which has obvious week points along the metatarsal flex points. The end result is that I blew a hole in the mesh at those flex points after only 100 miles of rough trail running. This would be a superior shoe if they beefed up the upper to something more like the X-Talon 212. Otherwise it was a fun shoe while it lasted!
01/17/13 @ 11:42
Comment from: Max Powers [Visitor]
Max PowersI love my Bare Grip 200s! I use them for 10+ mile trail runs, they are amazing. I have used them for Tough Mudders and Spartan Races and let me tell you, I have yet to slip. Yes you can feel everything you step on but that's true of all VFFs and other true minimalist shoe. For trails, its not as bad as you would think. The lugs also don't hold much mud which is amazing when waist deep in mud. They probably aren't the best for dried hard packed trails due to the aggressive lugs but I haven't mad any issues.
01/17/13 @ 11:48
Comment from: Cody R. [Visitor]
Cody R.i've looked at these a bit, and other cleated minimal shoes if i ever got into something with cleats again, i've just done it barefoot, even on the street, which teaches you to be light on your feet alright lol

only thing i'd suggest is that if the toe box was more anatomical, maybe they could just make the shoe upper flatter, if i can make it clear enough

i had another idea too, but i for got :/
01/17/13 @ 18:04
Comment from: Cody R. [Visitor]
Cody R.i've looked at the minimalist cleated trail shoes selection to see if i ever needed things that required cleats again
i mostly do football or something barefoot , even on the street, which is a great way to learn to stay light on your feet by the way,

a suggestion to get a better toe box and not slide around would be to make the upper hug the foot more, i forgot my other idea but i forgot :/
besides just buying it a smaller size
01/17/13 @ 18:09
Comment from: Andrew [Visitor]
AndrewI've been using the baregrip 200 for over a year now, during that time I've had a couple of pairs.

In my opinion, this is the only full blown 'barefoot style' shoe on the market that can truly cope with the type of muddy conditions that we get through the winter in the UK.

However for future versions I think it would benefit immensely from................

The anatomic last, as used on the trailroc. The performance last used on the baregrip is out of kilter with what i believe most people will be looking for in a 'barefoot' style shoe. In addition, the toe box in the baregrip feels particularly narrow and pointy even compared to other inov-8 shoes that I own with the performance last. It's like a stiletto.

It needs reinforcement around the whole toebox to increase durability of the upper. Especially around the main flex point where the toes join the metatarsals. The mesh around this area is very prone to failing through stress at the flex point and abrasion from debris. I'm no shoe designer but I would have thought that a rand around the front similar to that which is fitted to the x-talon 212 would completely eliminate this problem with a small increase in weight (as would widening the toe box). I've had to start repairing both pairs of mine after minimal use (<50 miles) and have had to repeat this several times.

Other than that, a nice but flawed shoe
01/19/13 @ 08:34