Comment from: Jesse [Visitor] Email
JesseI think it's great to see VFFs getting airtime, however as long as they are seen as just a passing 'fad' I feel that they're a long way from mainstream acceptance. That said, my KSOs do get recognized more frequently and the responses I get are more often "Oh, I just read about those" instead of "what the?!?!"
07/15/10 @ 13:41
Comment from: August Kryger [Visitor]
August KrygerI found it interesting that Al said his knee surgeon said he needed lots of support to run. Well, I had major reconstructive knee surgery several years back. After that, I couldn't run more than a mile without pain in normal (expensive) "running" shoes. Now that I've switched to Vibrams I've run 17 miles pain-free. As in, nothing hurts at all. If I do happen to have the unfortunate incident of running in normal shoes, it hurts pretty quickly. Right now I am training for a marathon and would never be able to do that in mainstream shoes. To me, this is the most conclusive personal evidence that less is more. I hope physicians can become more educated about this and help dispel the myths of the running shoe world.
07/15/10 @ 14:37
Comment from: Fwear [Visitor]
FwearI don't think it is a fad because it is not about looks or perceived results. It just feels good.
07/15/10 @ 15:19
Comment from: Ryan [Visitor] Email
RyanI'm happy to see my favorite five toed wonders get some spotlight and not be trashed on or mislead the public (like my local news station) and the "fad" thing at least for me will never be true as I'll wear them till the day I die or lose my feet.
07/15/10 @ 20:10
Comment from: Juggling Joe [Visitor]
Juggling JoeThat was nice exposure for VFF's, I thought. The most sensible option out of the "shoes" presented, by far. Those shape ups and toners will come and go much quicker than VFF's and barefoot running (at least I hope, let's hope Americans can be patient enough to try something that is not a "quick" fix, but is a gradual approach).

I get more "I've heard about those" reactions nowadays too. Even kids are aware of them, too.
07/15/10 @ 20:24
Comment from: Amy Stewart [Visitor]
Amy StewartI hated that they lump VFFs into the shape-ups category, although I can see the reason: it's gaining popularity, and it is a funny-looking thing you wear on your feet. But the similarities end there.

I would be interested to know how many Shape-ups wearers have twisted their ankles in those ridiculous, gimmicky monstrosities.

I am glad they showed the barefoot woman saying that she wants to tell fellow runners that they might be able to lose the knee brace if they also lose the shoes. And I think Al Roker needs a second opinion.

07/19/10 @ 07:27
Comment from: Cheryl [Visitor]
CherylYou did not mention the gray shoes that Ann Curry was wearing? They were refered to as minimalist running shoes. What brand?
07/19/10 @ 21:10
Comment from: LJHudd [Visitor]
LJHuddAnn Curry was wearing the "Nike Free" shoes - I tried them on when I went to buy my Bikilas and they are not much different to other regular 'traditional' running shoes. They are more flexible but still restrictive and to me the heal was the most uncomfortable... too much support.
07/21/10 @ 13:40
Comment from: jtcitrus [Visitor]
jtcitrusMy mother had those curved shoes. She stumbled on the driveway and b/c of those shoes was unable to catch her balance. she wound up breaking her shoulder/arm.
07/26/10 @ 08:14
Comment from: John [Visitor]
JohnThe cynic in me guesses the "attacks" won't really begin until they get more mainstream. Then people with a distinct bias will come forth to "educate" the public as to the things to watch out for. None of which will be anything more than generalizations from people who will cite no study, nor will have any first hand knowledge of problems. It will be very much like Mr Roker's assumption that the shoes are bad due to "no support", but with much more negativity. I hope that day never comes.
11/23/10 @ 20:22