If you’re like me, then it’s time to replace those original Minimus Trails that you picked up back in 2011 just a few weeks after they were widely released. Luckily, New Balance has come through with a reboot and update of the Minimus 10 in both the Road and Trail editions. They’re aptly called the Minimus 10v2 Trail and the Minimus 10v2 (for the Road).
Read on to see how they fared!
Because it can be a bit difficult to keep New Balances naming scheme straight in your head, before we jump into the review here’s a quick history of the Minimus line up (click the links for Birthday Shoe reviews):
2011 – New Balance comes out with the Minimus 10 in Road and Trail versions. The Trails have a Vibram sole and both have a 4mm heel drop. There are also casual Life and Hiking/Multi-Sport versions. Currently all of these older models are still available, most at a discount (prices ranging from $50 – $120) — see Joe’s NB Outlet.
2012 – The Minimus Zero lineup comes out in Road and Trail versions. These are zero drop heel. New Balance also releases a Minimus 10 Trail in leather.
2013 – The Minimus 10 lineup is refreshed and is creatively called the 10v2 Trail and 10v2 Road. These have the same 4mm heel drop as the originals from 2011. There is currently no word of a Minimus Zero update in 2013.
Minimus 10v2 Trail
For those of you familiar with the original Minimus Trails, to answer your first question, yes the toe box and rubberized strap across the top of the shoe feels like it has been widened—rejoice! For those who don’t have a history with the original Trails, there was a terrible forefoot band over the top of the shoe that after an extended session of wear, felt quite restricting. I’ve put in a couple of 16 hour days comprised of running, lifting weights, walking through large airports, and just wearing them casually and at this point I think I can declare that there is no more strap problem.
For comparison, here are the Minimus Trail (original on left) and the Minimus Trail 10v2:
Pretty similar looking, eh? Note the thick strap across the midfoot is the most different piece.
The fit is excellent, the shoe is fairly lightweight, and the sole provides a decent ground feel—basically what you’d expect from this type of shoe. The Vibram lugged sole hooks up on various surfaces and terrains and would make an excellent shoe for meandering on the asphalt down to the trailhead for some off road running. There isn’t that much flexibility in the sole when compared to minimalist offerings from other companies and it should also be noted that (love it or hate it) there is a bit of toe-spring at the front, as the front of the shoe curves up slightly.
The Minimus Trail 10v2 is listed at 6.2 ounces and comes in the blue and green shown here, black and orange, and a more subtle black and silver.
It is currently available on the New Balance website for $110.
Minimus 10v2 Road
While I don’t have any experience with the original Minimus Road, the consensus I’ve heard is that they were nothing to write home about, and were generally just “ok.” If you are familiar with the original release, the Minimus Road 10v2’s biggest change is a move to a Vibram produced sole that has a design similar to the Trail’s. The upper has had a makeover and the now sports an attached tongue like you’d find on last year’s Minimus Zeros.
While I really love the Minimus Trail 10v2s for all aspects of use, I can’t really get behind the Minimus Road 10v2s for running. I think they look great casually with a pair of jeans, but I don’t think that New Balance got the fit quite right. The toe box is quite wide, which is great! They are almost as wide as some of Vivo Barefoot’s shoes, if you’re familiar with that company. I’m a size 11 across the board with New Balance, which is what I reviewed here, and while the length seems to be right, the whole upper generally feels awkwardly oversized. I like to wear my shoes pretty tight for running (thus my penchant for Vibram Five Fingers) and even when cinching down the shoe laces, I felt like there was still too much play. After one particularly short but fast treadmill run, I could feel tingling hotspots on the bottom of my feet.
The wide toebox is great for casual wear, but unless you have hobbit feet, I’d considering trying to size down a half size or give them a thorough test fit at your local running store. I also found that the instep was quite narrow, and I felt like I was landing on the inside of my foot with each step. This is one thing I noted about the Minimus Zero Roads and didn’t really care for until the wider 2E version was released.
Like the Trails, the Minimus Road 10v2’s sole isn’t all that flexible, but the ground feel was adequate and they seemed to hook up well at the track, on asphalt, and even on dirt.
The Minimus Road 10v2 is listed at 6.5 ounces and comes in the white and blue shown here, red and yellow, and a slap you in the eyeballs high-viz neon yellow and blue. It is also currently available on the New Balance website for $110.
Conclusion
The updated Minimus 10v2 Trail is all of the good of the original Minimus Trail with none of the bad. It’s got the same great look and performance, and now it also has the right fit too. New Balance definitely got it right on these. Go out and pick up a pair if your aging Trails are in need of a replacement.
I’m not sure that the same can be said for the Minimus 10v2 Road though—I want to like them because I think they look pretty sharp and overall are quite comfortable. I just don’t think they are right for my foot when it comes to running, so these will definitely be a pair that you’ll want to try on before committing to purchasing.
Photos!
[GALLERY]
14 replies on “Review New Balance Minimus 10v2 Trail and Road”
I’m a huuge fan of the new balance minimus trail 10. Been running in it for little more than 1 year now in all kinds of weather.
When the shoes gets older though I notice 2 things, the yellow foamy material gets very very stiff and also the black rubber parts are falling off.
I’m wondering if the 10v2 has the same yellow foam, or if they switched the mixture in the new version.
Do the versions 2’s fit the same as the originals? For the first version I had to order a half size up. Do you think this would be the same case?
I cannot begin to say how big of a fan I am of the New Balance Minimus shoe line. I am so happy the a really big shoe company has made such a commitment to not only the minimalist style shoe, but the natural no drop type shoe.
With saying all of that, I can say that I like the original way more than this “new and improved” version of the Minimus line. I am a nag for the tongue in my shoe to be a certain way, and the tongue in this shoe leaves me wanting. I find that it almost always slides to one side of my foot, exposing the upper of my foot to the laces and the side it slipped to a rubbing and hot spot annoyance. I do not know if its how I walk or run, but it always ends up like this. I hope that the stitched in tongue comes back in the next version.
Does anyone else have this problem?
James T.
@jthrift
@Lars – From what I can tell, the foam looks and feels pretty similar. Not sure if the material used has been altered though.
@Jeremy – I’m an 11 in both the Trail 10 and the Trail 10v2. Both feel okay at first, but after a couple hours the Trail 10 feels tight across the top of the foot.
@James – Which model do you have the tongue problem with? The Trail 10 and 10v2 seem almost identical and the Road 10v2 no shares the attached tongue like the Minimus Zero Road.
The color is … awful…
That is all
I have the NB Minimus Zero (not trail) and they are great, but have no grip so aren’t good for trail running. This is a great review; it helped me to decide to get a pair of the Minimus Trail 10V2 shoes. I hope I like them as much as my (now quite worn) women’s Merrell Pace Glove shoes!
Thanks!
PS – I agree with someone’s comment above about the Minimus Zero Trail shoe. I only tried it on but immediately I felt that it would not suit (my) trail/mid-length (20km) running. It was very very light but did not feel very absorbent to shock nor was it comfortable.
Hi Tim. Good article. I’m looking into getting the Minimus and it seems the trail might be the best bet. Am I going to ruin the shoe if I take it out on the road? I will be taking them out in the wilderness too. Thanks.
@Michael–the trails will do just fine on the asphalt. They don’t have a serious enough lug to have any issues.
Hey Tim, In conclusion, would you consider the minimus road 10 to be suitable for wide feet? Don’t have the 2E in South Africa, so would have to settle for D. Worth it?
@Dehan, the Minimus Road 10v2 in this review was quite wide. I think you could get away with a D if you normally use a 2E.
Hi Tim, thanks for the review.
I have a pair of minimus oo, I enjoy them for most runs, but on rougher terrains my feet just kept getting wounded by rocks and stones. Are the soles for the V2 any thicker or different, or prevent the problem in any way? and if not, is there a shoe that does the trick in that sense (currently I run with brooks pure grit on tougher terrains)?
@Ran – The V2 soles are pretty similar in terms of thickness compared to the V1s. If you looking for even more protection, take a look at the Vivo Barefoot offerings.
I love running in the NB minimus on both trails and asphalt but I find that they don’t hold up well. They seem to do well for about three months and then completely fall apart. I only run about 15-20 miles a week and some of that is completely barefoot so I don’t think I am putting that much stress on them. I have tried several different styles with the same result. The fabric tears, soles come off etc. I am on my 4th pair now and I keep hoping that I can find a pair that will last since I love the feel of them. Has anyone had the same problem?
I accidentally bought the trail version online even though I generally run on road. Do you think I need to return them or can I go ahead and use the trail for road use?