Barefoot Shoes

Rogue Soft Star Shoes Review

Soft Star Shoes Rogue barefoot shoes review.

Soft Star Shoes recently released a new casual “barefoot shoe” for men called the Rogue. It’s a slip-on, Vibram-soled, leather-upper and sheepskin insoled shoe that’s as crazy comfortable as it is healthy for your feet and your posture. It also has an aesthetic that can be paired with a lot of different styles, a pretty important consideration. In short, it’s a barefoot shoe for everyday wear that’s worth some serious consideration.

Read on for the full review!

Soft Star Shoes

Soft Star Shoes is a perennial favorite of — not only are they family-owned outfit that manufacturers by hand all their products in their workshop in Corvallis, Oregon (read about it!) — but the shoes (and slippers) they make are fantastically comfortable.

Why are Soft Stars so (generally) comfortable? Simple, it’s baked into the design:

  • The shoes are neutral from heel to toe, allowing proper biomechanics and posture
  • The shoes have sizable toe boxes! Got wide feet? No problem!
  • Many of the shoes have sheepskin liners on the insoles. Have you ever owned a pair of sheepskin-lined shoes? If not, your bare feet have been missing out!
  • Even utilizing leather in many of their styles (Note: they have Vegan options), Soft Stars are usually very lightweight.

These factors combine to make a shoe your feet will be very pleased with.

The Shoes

Soft Star Shoes sent me the Rogues in “Aged Oak,” which has a weathered leather deep tan finish (They also come in an Aged Walnut, which is a darker brown leather).

Per the product page, these shoes are:

  • Full-grain aged leather for a “rustic look”
  • The upper interior is lined with our unique Breathe-O-Prene, a medical-grade material that is similar to neoprene but with improved ventilation and breathability. Breathe-O-Prene keeps the shoe fitting snugly around your foot for a secure and cozy fit.
  • The footbed is made with genuine sheepskin innersoles to keep feet warm and dry.
  • The Rogue features an 8mm version of our Vibram Geo sole. This lightweight sole is very pliable to allow barefoot-style movement and groundfeel with improved durability and traction.

Rogues have sizable toe boxes, no arch support, and are flat-soled. Take a look around the shoes:

The upper, insoles, and liner

The short of it is that the uppers and insoles of the Rogue are incredibly comfortable. Let’s break it down.

The leather ? the Rogues have a supple leather used for the exterior of the shoes. It’s very flexible out of the box and seems to comform to your feet over time. Note that your bare feet don’t ever touch the leather due to the Rogue’s Breathe-o-prene liner. You’ll see a stitch that runs no longer than an inch at the front of the Rogue. This basically allows for a larger vertical space for toe wiggle room. This keeps the uppers from squishing the big toe and also from creating these toe bumps that just look kinda a little off (as seen with the Soft Star Rambler photoed here)

The “Breathe-o-Prene” liner ? looks like Breathe-o-prene is used most often for various braces for knees, ankles, wrists, etc. So how did this material function in a minimalist shoe like the Rogue? Incredibly well. The BOP liner does a few things for the Rogues. It adds some structure to the upper, fortifying the leather. It specifically allows a good bit of stretch as you can see in this photo. All this without feeling constricting.

Against the skin, the liner is soft and non-abrasive. I often cite the original New Balance Minimus Life (Still one of my favorite shoes — and you can find them for $40-55 bucks if you click through to page 4 or 5) as having one of the best liners for bare feet in a minimalist shoe. However, the Breathe-O-Prene is even better. It lives up to it’s name by breathing well. Also, it adds a bit of thermal insulation on cooler days. I’ve not had the chance to wear the Rogues in temps above 75 or so, so it’s hard to say if they’d get “hot” in the summer. I’ll have to circle back on this in a few months.

Sheepskin insoles! ? There’s a reason that Australian ugg-style boots are so popular and you’d be hard pressed to say it’s because of a pair of uggs’ sexy looks. It’s the sheepskin.

I got sold on Soft Stars’ sheepskin insoles back with my first pair of Grippy Roos (By the way, I still wear my Grippy Roos some three years after that original review — can’t say that about many other minimalist shoes I own!). Sheepskin feels amazing on a bare foot, it wicks moisture away from the foot, and it also improves the connection between the shoe and the foot. How? By placing this fuzzy layer that helps create a connection between the soles of the Rogues and the foot — particularly when walking (so when the foot lifts, the sheepskin fills the gap between the hanging soles and your feet).

Suffice to say I’m a big fan of sheepskin insoles and when I saw the Rogue shoes would have them, I had a feeling I was going to like these shoes.

Overall, the upper of the Rogue makes for a decidedly roomy fit on my feet. It’s not tight in any way, shape, or form. Meanwhile, it’s not so loose as to feel like they’ll ever flip or flop off my feet.

The soles

The Rogue shoes have an 8mm thick Vibram sole. That’s a fairly thick rubber sole compared to other Soft Stars I’ve reviewed (leather soled Roos I’ve reviewed have a 2mm thick sole in total!). However, the rubber is the foamy sort meaning that it’s not so dense that it’s heavy or firm. This means that I can still notice the grout lines from a tiled floor. Mind it’s not going to be as much ground feel as any < 4-5mm thick soled minimalist shoe, but it’s more ground feel than a pair of Trek-soled FiveFingers.

As for traction, I’ve yet to have any slippage in the Rogues though I have walked on some lightly wet terrain. Without any real lugging, you’re not going to be trekking the Himalayas in the Rogue, but that’s not their intended function either.

One aspect about the Rogues’ soles is that since the uppers are stitched to the soles on the tops of the soles, the sole necessarily extends past the foot on all sides. At most once a day (maybe once every other day) I find the front lip of the Rogues might “catch” on something. The Rogues lack toe spring, so if I’m not dorsiflexing my toes enough (though it is easy to do in the Rogues as seen here), the lip can catch on uneven terrain and sorta trip you up. Well, “trip” is probably a strong word here, but it can just catch.

Also, the extension of the sole at the rear of the Rogue has some interesting implications ? namely, it serves as a “catch” for overlong jeans and pants. You’ll see that better in some of the pictures below in the “looks” section.

Overall, the soles are going to provide you with a ground feel that’s comfortable all day long.

The looks

The first thing I did on wearing the Rogues was ask my wife what she thought of them. I don’t remember exactly what she said, but it was something like “yeah they’re fine.” I’ll take that, particularly when her first reaction to Soft Star Ramblers was … well, less than positive.

I like the Rogue aesthetic. In the Aged Oak leather, it has a clean look that conveys comfort and a minimalist style. The leather stitching at the base of the shoes adds some dimension to their look. The vertical stitch on the front of either pair also makes the shoes have a more traditional shape at the front. If I had my “druthers,” I’d probably figure out a way to make the uppers stitch to the soles in a way that doesn’t have a lip (as is the case with Roos or RunAmoc Dashes). However, in practice, the lip doesn’t detract as much from the overall look as I thought it might.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and as casual, leather barefoot shoes go, I think the Rogue is one of the better options out there. Paired with non-skinny jeans or even khakis, they seem to “fit.”

And for some reason, I don’t think there are a lot of BirthdayShoes readers with legs that can fit into skinny jeans.

Take a look at the photos below to get a better feel for how the Rogues pair up with different pants.

Casual jeans.

I tend to cut my casual jeans on the sides to make them lay down over my shoes. Don’t know if others like this look, but I do and have for some time. The Rogues look good in a pair of bootcut jeans that are decidedly worn-in. Check it out:

Nice jeans.

The Rogues also paired well with a pair of non-cut, dark washed Gap bootcut jeans I own. You can see that in the photos below. I’ve also worn them with straight leg jeans and they work well enough there, too.

Khaki pants.

Finally, paired up with Khaki pants the Rogues looked good. Check it out:


Overall, there is a lot to like in Soft Star Rogue shoes. I’ve a feeling they’re going to be a shoe I return to frequently in the coming months and perhaps even years. It’s hard to go wrong with a pair of minimalist shoes that feels so great on my feet, can be worn all day without discomfort, and fit well with my sense of style. I can’t say the overall feel is one I’ve had with any other pair of barefoot or minimalist shoes I own, and it all adds up to having a pair of shoes you’re very likely to forget you’re wearing.

The main drawback I found with the Rogue is just the extra lip. I just wish it wasn’t there because it detracts marginally from the function (e.g. the random catching of the lip when walking) and marginally from the aesthetic. Re-made without the lip, I think the Rogue would be just about perfect.

I guess there’s one other drawback: the Rogue retails at $125, which isn’t cheap. I’d chalk it up to the fact that they are made from high-quality materials (leather, sheepskin, Vibram rubber, and a medical grade liner!) by hand in the U.S. By elves.

I mostly wore the Rogues without socks. However, I was happy to find that with socks they were still super comfortable. You don’t get quite as much sensation from the sheepskin insole when wearing socks, but socks pair up with the Rogues no problem.

A note on sizing: while I’m typically a 10.5, Soft Star doesn’t offer their shoes in half sizes, so I’ve always sized up to 11. This hasn’t ever been a problem. While I could see the Rogues being even better in a true 10.5, the extra length just adds a little more wiggle room for my toes.

I think I covered all the bases but if I missed anything, hit me up in the comments! Do you have the Rogues? Love Soft Star shoes? Let’s hear it!

By Justin

Justin Owings is a deadlifting dad of three, working from Atlanta. When he's not chasing his three kids around, you'll find him trying to understand systems, risk, and human behavior.

18 replies on “Rogue Soft Star Shoes Review”

Wow. Those look good Justin. I might have to go with these instead of the Dash. I’ve been wanting to get a pair of the Dash smooth for wearing to the office (casual dress), but the WAF has been pretty low on them (WAF = Wife Acceptance Factor).

I’ll show her these and see if they are up to higher standards.

Question about the Breathe-O-Prene. Is it lined in the whole upper, or just where your foot goes in?
The stitching makes it look like it stops just inside of the upper.

Size worries me… I see they only go up to size 12, but I normally like to wear a size 13 in other footwear… and I note that you go up a half size when you order, so that makes me very nervous!

If they made these in black, I could wear them to work! I wonder if black shoe polish would do the trick?

These would make a great casual shoe, from the looks of it…

Great review Justin. I will cosign that these shoes really are amazing.

I own a pair of Rogue’s, and I must say that they are probably the most comfortable pair of shoes that I’ve ever worn. The comfort provided by theese shoes is akin to the feel of a pair of cozy slippers worn indoors on a cold winter day.

The shoes fit snug like gloves, or a skull cap on the head; and despite the beefy look, the soles are foam-like as Justin has said, and they do not affect your gait in the least bit.

The only downside to the shoe is the price, but that is mitigated by the outstanding quality. Soft Star is grass roots when its comes to shoe making, and that’s what makes the company and their products so special. I think the Rogue’s could easily withstand many miles of walking before they even dream of coming apart. Mines still look great after about a month of wear, and over 50 miles of casual walking.

I highly recommend the Rogue’s. They are a must have for your casual minimalist footwear.

Hello Justin,

I have read your reviews of these Rogues, and of the VFF Speed XC. I’m looking for a minimalist shoe to wear casually (got Bikilas for running), and both appeal to me aesthetically.
However, I was wondering about the differences in terms of fitting. More specifically: do the rogues feel a bit like they’re ‘hanging loose’ around your feet, compared to the more snug VFFs? The Rogues seem more comfortable and seem to have more ground feel, but I’m just worried that walking on them will make me want to clench too much to keep them on, since I have a rather low arch. Do the laces on the Speed XC mean they are easier to fit more closely on the arch? Also, is there a significant difference in warmth? It’s getting kinda cold here now…

Thanks, cheers from Belgium

I like them! I don’t think they are particularly feminine… I have the Ramblers and like you, I find that while they are comfy, they aren’t the most stylish things out there. I do like their new merry metro though and plan to pick up a pair for myself soon.


The two are very, very different. The XCs are going to feel snug/tight on your feet and be a good bit stiffer in the sole. Ground feel will be different due to the much denser rubber being used (though similarly thick to the Rogues).

The Rogues don’t really feel like they’re hanging loose on my feet (like they’re going to fall off) but they do wear “loose” on my feet — they don’t feel bound to my feet, in other words. It’s like the feel of a thick cotton sock you’ve been wearing all day long, if that helps.

Well my size 12 are snug, as I suspected… My feet measure 11 3/8 in length and and 4 1/2 in width and should fit their size 12, but with my morton’s toe they are too short and my pinky toe is a little constrained too… however I have continued to wear them since they don’t sell anything larger and have found that there is enough give in the material that the snugness is not enough to make me give up on this pair. The sheepskin footbed is incredible for comfort, these transion from slipper to casual shoe and I love them in both settings. Although the design does not have the wife approval factor going for it, I have not had anyone else comment on the appearance, which can’t be said for my luna sandals or my vff…

Had my pair for 2 weeks now, these are great shoes! I get lots of compliments on them, great company to do business with too

I finally bought a pair of Rogues-Aged Oak. And decided since I’ve been eyeing this company via this blog for over a year now to get the Ramblers as well.

I don’t think I’ll ever wear a “traditional” shoe again. I’m in love!!!!!!!!!!

Question for Justin (and anyone else): Which Softstar shoes are best for winter – Rogue, Roos or Rambler? I live north of NYC and spend time both in and out of the city. Probably will be wearing these in light snow conditions on the city streets as well as walking in the woods near home. I’m curious about both warmth and water resistance. (I suppose in really snowy/slushy conditions I could add rubber galoshes if necessary). Any thoughts? Or other brands/models I should be looking at? Thanks, all!

Hey Michael A

I would go with the Rogue for winter. It has a thicker sole than the Roo (similar to the Rambler) but a lined upper (Rambler upper isn’t lined).

I keep on hoping softstar will make the shoe I want them to make, and I’m wondering if they ever will. I have the dash in a size 11 and honestly, there is a lot of extra footbed material, a “lip” as you call it. I asked them to make me a size 10.5 and they wouldn’t do it. I tried the Moc3s and liked how they got rid of the extra sole material around the perimeter of the footbed but I didn’t like the feeling of breath-o-prene all over my foot. It felt un-natural. For some reason Softstar believes there should be an extended lip of sole around the perimeter of all their shoes, except for the moc3 I guess. It really restricts natural movement because you have to lift up your foot as opposed to roll it forward.

Why can’t they just make a shoe that is made of all natural materials, put a little more structure into it, cut out the extra footbed material and make the sole more like the moc3, and offer it in half sizes?

So I tried out the rogues in size 11 (i’m usually a 10.5-11 in other shoes) and my feet are quite narrow.

These shoes are extremely snug and small fitting. My toes come nearly to the end but with 1/2 cm to spare, so the length almost too small but I think it is workable. The vertical space in the toebox is very limited. I think this is why people are sizing up, not because of the length, but because it is just too snug fitting around the toebox. Now I’m in the unfortunate position of having to size up to a 12 (!) in order to get the toebox room I need. I don’t think I’m going to do it, as that would be far too long of a shoe for me, and I’ve already caught the front lip on the ground.

It’s sad, everything else about the shoe rocks.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *