Honestly when I was first approached by Justin about doing some wear testing for Skechers™ I was a bit skeptical. After all, these days when the word “Skechers” is brought up in conversation it’s usually referring to, at best, their casual line of footwear (I myself have owned several pairs of casual and dress shoes made by Skechers). At worst, the conversation turns to the Skechers Shape Ups™ and what a controversial and frankly silly shoe this. Actually, Justin put the Shape Ups on a top 10 gimmicky shoes list awhile back (here).
However, I’d also watched Meb Keflezighi crush the U.S. Olympic Trials Marathon in a pair of Skechers GO Run™ shoes—not only winning the event but running a personal best time. I’d also read several favorable reviews of the Skechers GO Run. So perhaps the Skechers Performance Division was serious about making a shoe that runners would want to run in. I’ve got an open mind so I figured “why not?”
So began my interface with the Skechers Performance Division. I quickly learned that this team was very serious and very genuine about trying to build quality performance running and walking footwear. I actually wanted to share a bit about how the Performance Division came to be as well as what their vision is for Skechers. What better way to do that than to share a word from two of the leaders in the group? Meet Rick Higgins, David Raysse, and Kurt Stockbridge. These three are the V.P. of Marketing, V.P. of Design, and V.P. of Technical Development, respectively, for the Skechers Performance Division. Here’s what they had to say about their brief history and their approach to making running and walking shoes.
Our team made a decision to enter the performance footwear arena three years ago. We knew that in order to be successful we’d need to take a completely different approach and build a division separate from the fashion and lifestyle arms of the company. So we assembled a small team made up of veteran individuals from many of the leading athletic footwear companies to build a line of products that will meet the needs and high expectations of the most demanding running and walking consumers. Though most of us are runners, we embrace the fact that the needs of accomplished runners are much greater than our own and thus we made the decision, as part of our process, to depend on their direct feedback and advice to help guide us towards building the best performing products possible. Our team firmly believes in this approach and that the key to our success will be the unique combination of our experience base and our ability to listen directly to runners and walkers regarding their needs. In short, our marching orders are to answer to runners rather than layers of management. And we believe that this open innovation approach coupled with complete autonomy and the support from Skechers executive team will enable success.
Once the team was in place, we dug in immediately and got to know Meb (Keflezighi) and local Manhattan Beach Ultra marathoner Christian Burke, who was introduced through this site several months ago*. We extracted as much information and subjective feedback from them as we could over a year… and the GO run was the first shoe born from this approach. The word spread and we since have formed strong relationships with many more very demanding and experienced runners, walkers, and subject matter experts. Just like us, they are very excited to be involved in building something new and pure… especially when the end result reflects their input and values. And it helps that we are both motivated by a similar objective (though from different angles) – having a wider variety of worthy footwear choices available to runners and walkers…. A true win-win scenario for everyone involved.
—Rick Higgins and Kurt Stockbridge (Skechers Performance Division)
As for my own involvement with Skechers, a couple of months ago I started receiving a number of current, soon to be released and future prototype running shoes to test, evaluate and provide feedback on (note: I receive no payment from Skechers other than from the prototype shoes I have been testing, which are provided free of charge). Basically I received a bunch of prototypes in the mail then proceeded to run in them as part of my normal shoe rotation and on my typical routes and training runs. After I’d gotten a good feel for the shoes I’d write up some comments and suggestions and pass these on to the design team. Typically they’d ask some follow-up questions and we’d carry on a good back and forth dialog.
Unfortunately, I was extremely new to the Skechers wear testing crew and arrived too late in the prototype stage to help influence any of the immanent product releases other than confirming that they are on the right track. However my input, along with that of a few other runners, is being incorporated early on in the process regarding their 2013 models currently underway.
Anyhow, I’ve been running for over 20 years and have gone through a lot of shoes; some good, some average and some downright awful! I honestly believe I know enough about running shoes, particularly off-road running shoes, to hopefully contribute some useful feedback. We’ll see how it goes!
In the meantime, stay tuned for a full review of the GoRun Ride!
* Via this skeptical post about the introduction of the Skechers GoRun penned by Justin.
7 replies on “Shoe Innovation through Collaboration: Skechers Performance Division”
Nice that Skechers got meb on board but I think of shoes as tires. If the car sucks then it doesn’t matter what kind of tires you use.
@Mikim: True enough, but the reverse is definitely not true. I doubt Meb, or any athlete for that matter, would jeopardize their race performance by wearing a sub-par shoe. 🙂
I’d be cautious working with Skechers.
Don’t forget, they just got dinged with a $50 million false advertising judgement. They made at least 10x that off of the ‘scientifically backed’ shoes themselves, of course. That could be a reflection on how the company operates.
The barefoot or minimalist running field is especially prone to hype and misleading information.
(link to Skechers advertising story)
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/breaking/chi-fi-ftc-skechers-20120517,0,2592762.story
That said, they need user feedback just like any other shoe company. Just be careful!
@rob
Not sure if that is a sponsor deal or not. Input was given so prolly some investment
@John White: Yes, we all know how Skechers got dinged with the $50 million false advertising judgement. Keep in mind that Skechers is a huge company with many groups and divisions. The group that I and several other runners are working with, the Performance Division, is a totally new and different group that are serious about making a good product. While I can’t reveal too much right now, the proof is in some of the prototypes I am and have been testing. This is good stuff and I think serious runners are going to like what they see. And simply the fact that they are open to actual user feedback in a fast turn-around, rapid prototyping way leads me to believe that they really do care about what real runners think.
@Mikekim: Sponsor deal or not, investment or not an athlete isn’t going to wear a shoe that would compromise his potential. Believe me I know. While I’m no Meb I have been a sponsored athlete in the past and if I didn’t believe in the product I wouldn’t use it. It would be pretty dumb to handicap yourself! 🙂
If anybody is still in doubt, check out what Pete Larson at Runblogger.com has to say about Skechers and the Go Bionic: http://www.runblogger.com/2012/03/skechers-go-bionic-review-lightweight.html
I agree with Rob: Yes, Skechers got dinged (I am surprised the other big names haven’t been hit with huge lawsuits yet), but their Performance Division seems legit.
Let’s not judge this book by its cover just.